A slip and fall accident can cause painful and sometimes permanent injury. But if you’re hoping for compensation from a property owner or business proprietor, you must prove the accident was their fault rather than yours. One of the requirements of a premises liability claim is that the hazard which causes the fall cannot be readily apparent to the victim. An “open and obvious” hazard gives the victim notice of the danger and allows the victim to choose whether to proceed in spite of the danger.
In Virginia, when a case involves an open and obvious hazard, such as a visibly damaged staircase, the judge or jury must weigh whether the victim was reasonable in deciding to encounter the hazard or a reasonable person would have taken an alternative route. If the victim was unreasonable, meaning he did not act with proper care for his own safety, the victim is guilty of contributory negligence. This means the victim’s own carelessness helped bring about his injuries. Under Virginia law, if there is a showing of contributory negligence, the victim cannot recover any damages from the defendant.
As you can imagine, the open and obvious defense is very popular in cases where the hazard might not have been completely hidden:
Depending on how the facts are presented, the open and obvious nature of the hazard might present a bar to recovery. But is there a defense to this defense? In fact, there are a couple of ways a plaintiff might defeat the open and obvious defense:
Ultimately, an injured party hoping to hold a property owner accountable for a slip and fall must show they were reasonable but the property owner was not.
If you are injured in a slip and fall Virginia, North Carolina or South Carolina, trust a law firm with more than 200 years of combined legal experience. Call Marcari, Russotto, Spencer & Balaban at (888) 351-1038 or contact us online to schedule a free consultation.
Our trained operators are ready to assist.Start Chat
Available 24/7 — We’ll come to you